history of science Rob Ilif The field of history of science (hereafter called "history of science") is concerned with the history of how different societies have manipulated, modeled, and un

It constrains moral values ​​in that certain forms of scientific endeavor can and should be situated in historical contexts.

Acres for historians of science to debate whether or not it demeans scientists to show that even the most successful theories are influenced by modern religion and other "non-scientific" values. Whatever one may make of the ability of science to escape local conditions of production, the course of the history of science has been influenced by a number of external forces, notably the two world wars, and perhaps the most powerful of these was the Cold War, by which, in times of crisis, science as a model For a self-critical and meritocracy society, it appeared in the eyes of the Democrats. Although somewhat neutral, it is recognized as a form of knowledge that can only originate in the West. In the West, there was an unprecedented opportunity to pursue and spread the knowledge of nature for its own sake and at the same time correspond with other knowledge. Researchers For Marxists, science is justified by its application in the outside world. It has emerged as a paradigmatic example of how many human beings, such as technicians, engineers, and scientists, can work together for the common good.

The history of science in the 20th century has gone through several stages. The former was marked by notable individual contributions by writers such as Pierre Duhame and J. A. Dreyer, while major contributions to the philosophy of science were owed to scientists such as Duhame, Ernst Mach, and Henri Poincaré. Second, in the immediate aftermath of World War I, the history of science seemed to embody what George Sarton calls the "new humanism." It seems to explain how civilized peoples all over the world contributed to a great project that could transcend their petty nationalistic and religious differences.

However, in the 1930s, the introduction of a socio-economic approach to the history of science, inspired by Marxism, led liberal humanists to emphasize the contribution of the individual, theory and "reason" to science. Marxists emphasized social economy, but